The Campaign of Crying on Bakrid: The Real Truth About Islamic Influencers

The Campaign of Crying on Bakrid: The Real Truth About Islamic Influencers

This Bakrid, something happened that caused stomach pain for some Islamic influencers.

The way influencers like Sahar Sheikh, Adnan Sheikh (Chicha), and Ejaz Khan are crying, wailing, and playing the victim card on this Bakrid doesn’t feel new to me at all. This is the same old game — whenever the law is enforced, they start screaming “Islam is in danger.”

 

Sacrifice on the street = Freedom?

The government is saying: Don’t slaughter animals on roads and public places. Maintain cleanliness, don’t block traffic, and don’t create bloody scenes in front of children. This is not oppression against Muslims — it’s basic civility.

But these influencers are turning it into an issue of “religious freedom.”

Adnan Sheikh quotes ChatGPT saying that 80% of people eat non-veg, so why stop Muslims? But the same Adnan marries a Hindu girl and converts her to Islam. Will he also cry about that girl’s “freedom”?

Ejaz Khan is directly threatening “we will take revenge.” This guy, who became famous through street fights, spreading vulgarity on TV, and drug-related activities, doesn’t understand the difference between veg and non-veg, but he definitely knows how to slash and kill.

Sahar Yunus Sheikh dreams of painting Mumbra green, but when questions are raised, she says “don’t talk about religion.” As an AIMIM mayor, her entire existence is based on religion, yet the moment the law came, she backed off.

These people earn money on normal days by shouting “Allahu Akbar” and pushing extremist content. But as soon as rules are applied, the “we are victims” drama begins.

 

What I saw, which these influencers hide:

When I was a Muslim, during Bakrid I used to see goats being slaughtered openly. Rivers of blood, screams, children getting scared — this was cruelty towards innocent, voiceless animals in the name of sacrifice.

These people cry about pollution and water wastage during Hindu festivals, but when questions are raised about their sacrifice, they scream “Islamophobia.” This double standard is the biggest problem with Islam — “one rule for ourselves, another for non-Muslims.”

India is a secular country. Everyone has equal rights here, but no one should get special privileges. Muslims have full freedom to perform sacrifice at home, in closed spaces, following the rules. But slaughtering on the streets, letting blood flow into drains — this is not acceptable in a civilized society.

 

The pain of being an ex-Muslim:

I left Islam, but even today I cannot openly declare myself an ex-Muslim because I know the punishment for it. This same fear is still deeply embedded in the minds of Indian Muslims. These influencers spread that very fear — by saying “Islam is in danger,” they radicalize the youth.

This is a mask. The reality is that these people want to defame India in Gulf countries to get funding and support.

 

Conclusion: Face the truth

I am not against Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, or Christians. But I am definitely against rigid Islamist ideology.

Indian Muslims should understand the game these Islamic influencers are playing. Sacrifice in the name of Allah is fine, but not by creating trauma for children and sanitation problems.

In India, the law should be the same for everyone. If questions can be raised on Hindu festivals, they can also be raised on Muslim sacrifices. Stop demanding special privileges and move towards a Uniform Civil Code.

The real sacrifice should be of blind faith and extremism.

Jai Hind.